Skip to main content

Trophee by Lancome ( Revised )

Mandarin, Bergamot, Grapefruit, Basil, Lemon, Lime, Petitgrain.
Gardenia, Rhododendron, Freesia, Laurel, Cedar, Jasmine, Patchouli.
Amber, Incense, Moss, Musk, Tonka Bean.

Yet another revision due to a seemingly good mini from three years ago. Apparently, it was a bit off, so it's only proper to do a more accurate review this time around. Minis can be unstable as I have found out and even when they look "right" or haven't turned rancid, they are capable of giving the wearer an erroneous experience. My previous review from 2009 wasn't a negative one. I was simply left wanting and walked away unimpressed.

This particular sample does impress me however and the citric accord is especially good. It's a bit sharp from the lime and grapefruit, but in a positive way. It's never "biting" and the quick onset of jasmine and freesia round off any edges that may have been lurking.

Within a few minutes, a very subtle menthol appears along with a leather quality. Neither are strong, but I find that they pair well with the floral-woods combo that is gradually becoming prominent.

Trophee reminds me of a summer fragrance more than it does the sport of Golf. It would be a completely appropriate scent to wear on the course and that's the idea here. You have a nice interpretation of citrus, florals and woods accented by light spice, subtle resin and leathery moss.

Trophee is conservative in volume as well as aroma. Sillage is moderate at best, with longevity being approximately 3 to 4 hours on me. Released in 1982, you can expect this to be classic in smell, but don't expect it to be dated. Thumbs up from Aromi for Lancome's Trophee and as always, a sample wear is recommended.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Oriental Lounge by The Different Company

Bergamot, Curry Leaf, Pepper, Red Rose, Tonka Bean, Labdanum, Satinwood. I suppose the first thing I noticed about Oriental Lounge is that as a man, this is a bit of a stretch to pull off. Since the core of Oriental Lounge is a powdery tonka and amber duo, it really does lean a bit too far feminine for me to wear. However, it would smell just as lovely on a woman and more appropriate as well. I bring this up simply because it's marketed as shared. I was wondering about the curry leaf. Actually, this "note" brought nothing to the table with the exception of possibly enhancing the pepper note just a bit. Even so, the pepper note itself was low key ( at least on me ) and both blended nicely with the citrus opening. From the onset of Oriental Lounge, it's unmistakable that this fragrance is.......well.....an oriental. From other opinions, I read some gripes about longevity, but it lasts on me quite awhile. This fragrance is uncomplicated and without much movemen...

Black Suede by Avon

Nutmeg, Clove, Amber, Musk, Moss, Wood Notes. Yes.........I am reviewing one of the Rodney Dangerfield's of fragrance. Black Suede has been gracing medicine cabinets, for better or worse, since 1980 my friends. If you're expecting me to inform you ( like others may have already ) that Black Suede is a nasty scrubber, you will be disappointed. On the other hand, if you're expecting a glowing review claiming it's a diamond in the rough, you won't hear that from me either. I will say though that Black Suede doesn't deserve the hate it's received and most of that is due to snobbery aimed at Avon products in general. I kid you not when I state that a close relative to this fragrance is Cacharel Pour L'Homme. The array of spice in both ensure comparison, but the "smoother" of the two is Black Suede due to its implementation of Amber. While wearing Black Suede, one can detect a hint of "drugstore". That quality doesn't manife...

Paco Rabanne Pour Homme

I am reviewing the original Paco Rabanne Pour Homme ( circa 1973 ) thanks to a generous basenoter who sent it to me recently in a swap. He also sent me the current formulation in order for me to do a side by side comparison. The side by side resulted in what I had already imagined would be the case. Not that the newer formula is terrible by any means. The original version simply is better by being deeper and a bit more masculine. No......you shouldn't go to ebay searching for the vintage formula and paying stupid prices. It's simply a notch or two better than the current and noticeable by comparing the two in real time. Rabanne Pour Homme opens with a slight shimmer in conjunction with lavender, spices and a subtle woodiness. It's an old school introduction, however a good one. The lavender takes about 5 minutes to raise its volume and evolve into a soapy rendition. I dislike when a boatload of soapy lavender takes over a composition, but here it doesn't go over t...