Skip to main content

Tsar by Van Cleef & Arpels ( Vintage formula)

I recently recieved an extremely well kept bottle of vintage Tsar from xmen and the entire accord progression is intact. Sweet !!! I have not had the opportunity to sample the reformulated Tsar, so my opinion is reserved for the original.

This is a 1989 Fresh Fougypre from VCA and since most are familiar with Pour Homme, Tsar seems to be somewhat overlooked. I love the openings in 80's style Fresh Fougere/Chypre fragrances and naturally, Tsar does not disappoint.

Tsar opens with a slightly aromatic citric lavender made slightly edgy and bitter compliments of artemesia and neroli. It is a smooth accord and gives off a subtle damp or moist aura. I only get that in the opening and as the scent unfolds, it becomes more relaxed and dry.

The heart accord is what differentiates Tsar from others of its ilk. The use of juniperberry is adept and lends the perfect volume of herbaceousness to a spicy floral combo. The heart is actually impressive and utilizes carnation, jasmin, muguet, orris and rose. It's a unique balancing act and is well executed. The topnotes give way to this accord in a seamless fashion.

The base is full of Chypre-style heavies, but never does Tsar step on the sillage accelerator. It remains polite and the notes in this accord are respectful of one another. The amber-tonka never overstep their bounds and quietly restrain the leather,moss and patchouli from going over to the dark side. There is also a subtle musk in there as well that becomes apparent in extended drydown. All things being equal, vintage Tsar is most assuredly good to go and wardrobe worthy for classic frag lovers.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Oriental Lounge by The Different Company

Bergamot, Curry Leaf, Pepper, Red Rose, Tonka Bean, Labdanum, Satinwood. I suppose the first thing I noticed about Oriental Lounge is that as a man, this is a bit of a stretch to pull off. Since the core of Oriental Lounge is a powdery tonka and amber duo, it really does lean a bit too far feminine for me to wear. However, it would smell just as lovely on a woman and more appropriate as well. I bring this up simply because it's marketed as shared. I was wondering about the curry leaf. Actually, this "note" brought nothing to the table with the exception of possibly enhancing the pepper note just a bit. Even so, the pepper note itself was low key ( at least on me ) and both blended nicely with the citrus opening. From the onset of Oriental Lounge, it's unmistakable that this fragrance is.......well.....an oriental. From other opinions, I read some gripes about longevity, but it lasts on me quite awhile. This fragrance is uncomplicated and without much movemen...

Black Suede by Avon

Nutmeg, Clove, Amber, Musk, Moss, Wood Notes. Yes.........I am reviewing one of the Rodney Dangerfield's of fragrance. Black Suede has been gracing medicine cabinets, for better or worse, since 1980 my friends. If you're expecting me to inform you ( like others may have already ) that Black Suede is a nasty scrubber, you will be disappointed. On the other hand, if you're expecting a glowing review claiming it's a diamond in the rough, you won't hear that from me either. I will say though that Black Suede doesn't deserve the hate it's received and most of that is due to snobbery aimed at Avon products in general. I kid you not when I state that a close relative to this fragrance is Cacharel Pour L'Homme. The array of spice in both ensure comparison, but the "smoother" of the two is Black Suede due to its implementation of Amber. While wearing Black Suede, one can detect a hint of "drugstore". That quality doesn't manife...

Paco Rabanne Pour Homme

I am reviewing the original Paco Rabanne Pour Homme ( circa 1973 ) thanks to a generous basenoter who sent it to me recently in a swap. He also sent me the current formulation in order for me to do a side by side comparison. The side by side resulted in what I had already imagined would be the case. Not that the newer formula is terrible by any means. The original version simply is better by being deeper and a bit more masculine. No......you shouldn't go to ebay searching for the vintage formula and paying stupid prices. It's simply a notch or two better than the current and noticeable by comparing the two in real time. Rabanne Pour Homme opens with a slight shimmer in conjunction with lavender, spices and a subtle woodiness. It's an old school introduction, however a good one. The lavender takes about 5 minutes to raise its volume and evolve into a soapy rendition. I dislike when a boatload of soapy lavender takes over a composition, but here it doesn't go over t...