Skip to main content

Tom of Finland by Etat Libre d'Orange

Tom of Finland was most assuredly a reluctant sample wear for me. I expected a flanker of Secretions due to the promotional machine that runs this House. I am one of many that find Secretions absolutely nasty. Blood and semen do not float my olfactory boat, so it was with hesitance that I tried Tom Finland.

I have, however, sampled a few other from ELDO that were interesting and very wearable, so I thought..." How bad can it be? No way would they have the balls to put out another version of SM". Well, I was wrong to hesitate in sampling Tom of Finland. I've worn it three times now and admit to it being strangely good, yet something in the evolution of the scent comes to a halt when I wish it would transition a bit more.

I like the opening of aldehydes and citrus. It shimmers just enough to satisfy and then within minutes the spicy wood opens up and this accord leans green. It's like unripened wood bark and will have most wearers sniffing. There's a slight powder from iris and tonka creeping in slowly and with it a hint of vanilla, but only a hint. The iris also enables a leather note to come to fruition after about 5 minutes on my skin. I can't say any one note dominates, so it's a team effort here and I chalk that up to intelligent blending.

There are a few other players in ToF, but they can't seem to open up on me. Because of this, the drydown is what I just described albeit at a softer volume. The longevity is admirable with very respectable sillage. All in all, Tom of Finland is something I would have no problem wearing......and if I come across a bottle on the boards at a good price, I would probably pull the trigger. It's different enough from what I have in my drobe to warrant that. Thumbs up from Aromi for ELDO's Tom of Finland.



Comments

  1. I'd really like to try this, I love leather scents and am very into trying new ones out these days. The only prospect that doesn't thrill me is the iris/powdery accord. Small note, it's actually Tom of Finland. If I didn't say anything, Touko Laaksone would have rolled over in his grave. :)

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thanks Carrie ! I would not have noticed the typo had you not said something.

    The leather aura is modern and different than classic leather constructions. It's definitely of the softer variety and worth a sample wear.

    I don't get much powder, but enough that I recognize it as such. Too much iris or tonka kill a frag for me, but it's utilized pretty good in this one.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Such a strange offering conceptually, between citrus, vanilla, iris and aldehydes this sounds decidedly feminine, how would you categorize it? Nice intriguing review.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hey Dan. To me, it's like a woody oriental overall in spite of the suede-like note that's in there.

    Quite a few newer releases seem to defy classic categorization. They eschew the old constructions and just blend away. I guess no rules are good rules......as long as the finished product is good to go.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Black Suede by Avon

Nutmeg, Clove, Amber, Musk, Moss, Wood Notes. Yes.........I am reviewing one of the Rodney Dangerfield's of fragrance. Black Suede has been gracing medicine cabinets, for better or worse, since 1980 my friends. If you're expecting me to inform you ( like others may have already ) that Black Suede is a nasty scrubber, you will be disappointed. On the other hand, if you're expecting a glowing review claiming it's a diamond in the rough, you won't hear that from me either. I will say though that Black Suede doesn't deserve the hate it's received and most of that is due to snobbery aimed at Avon products in general. I kid you not when I state that a close relative to this fragrance is Cacharel Pour L'Homme. The array of spice in both ensure comparison, but the "smoother" of the two is Black Suede due to its implementation of Amber. While wearing Black Suede, one can detect a hint of "drugstore". That quality doesn't manife...

Chanel copying Guerlain. Why?

                      Last month, I had the pleasure of trying Comète by Chanel, the latest addition to their prestigious Les Exclusifs line. This fragrance follows the release of Le Lion in 2020, another standout in the same collection. Like Le Lion , Comète is a beautiful perfume that captures the essence of Chanel’s refined elegance. However, both fragrances bear a striking resemblance to classic creations by Guerlain, leading me to ponder the direction Chanel is taking. Chanel has a great fragrance history. Not as hallowed and old as Guerlain but for past three decades it has far outshone Guerlain. In my view, no other perfume house has come close to Chanel’s excellence in this century. This makes their recent approach of echoing Guerlain classics somewhat perplexing. Have they run out of fresh ideas? Is Roger Dove at the helm of their fragrance division, or have they perhaps...

La Chasse Aux Papillons Extreme by L'Artisan Parfumeur

I read many reviews before or after I do my own and I seem to be at complete odds with the house of L'Artisan. I have previously said on basenotes that for me, L'Artisan Parfumeur is the most over-rated house I have come across. La Chasse Aux Papillons Extreme does nothing to sway that opinion. Yet another linear, floral dominant scent that does nothing to stir me up or inspire me in any way. This house has "pleasant" nailed down to an art form......but damn...can't we go beyond that? The only attempt at polarization so far has been Dzongkha ....and I found it a jumbled mess. At these prices, move me, anger me, hate me.......but please don't bore me. Extreme in a nutshell is a toned down tuberose with assorted "blossom" thrown in the mix. Is it bad? No, it's an acceptable floral scent that's very timid and just lays on my skin smelling like....well....a toned down version of tuberose with blossom this or that added to it. I'm almost a...