Skip to main content

Paco Rabanne Pour Homme

Image
By
I am reviewing the original Paco Rabanne Pour Homme ( circa 1973 ) thanks to a generous basenoter who sent it to me recently in a swap. He also sent me the current formulation in order for me to do a side by side comparison.

The side by side resulted in what I had already imagined would be the case. Not that the newer formula is terrible by any means. The original version simply is better by being deeper and a bit more masculine. No......you shouldn't go to ebay searching for the vintage formula and paying stupid prices. It's simply a notch or two better than the current and noticeable by comparing the two in real time.

Rabanne Pour Homme opens with a slight shimmer in conjunction with lavender, spices and a subtle woodiness. It's an old school introduction, however a good one. The lavender takes about 5 minutes to raise its volume and evolve into a soapy rendition. I dislike when a boatload of soapy lavender takes over a composition, but here it doesn't go over the top. It's surely noticeable, but never becomes caustic.

Geranium is the leading the floral component in the heart accord. It is a well played card while the lavender interplays with the spicy, green accord that's still unfolding. These two notes ( to me) are the fingerprint of Pour Homme.  Rosewood is listed, but ( for me) is M.I.A.........and that's a shame since I love that note. There is a woody undercurrent, but it's very low key and doesn't introduce itself as a conventional rosewood.

As the drydown arrives, it isn't a dominating accord by any means. The notes used have a tendency to be loud, but not here. The tonka adds a very slight powder effect to an oncoming mossy amber duo. Honey is listed and I can't say I detect it as such. There's also a low volume musk that inserts itself well into the life of the scent. Everything about Paco Rabanne Pour Homme is classic in structure and aroma. Its smell reminds me of the 1970's and that could be good or bad, depending upon how you look at it.

The bottom line however is that Pour Homme is well done for its genre and one of the best in its class. Its success is contingent on the wearer liking classic fougere's. I like this original rendition, but I also have to be in the mood to smell retro. Any collector of classic masculines really should have the vintage formula of Pour Homme in their stockpile. Thumbs up from Aromi for Original Pour Homme.
Labels:

Comments

  1. AnonymousAugust 15, 2011 at 5:28 PM

    Is it easy to tell which bottle is which?
    Thanks.

    ReplyDelete
  2. shamu1August 21, 2011 at 9:09 PM

    This is so underrated, with so many people saying it smells dated. I love the vintage and the current versions equally. It's my favorite fragrance.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Black Suede by Avon

By
Nutmeg, Clove, Amber, Musk, Moss, Wood Notes. Yes.........I am reviewing one of the Rodney Dangerfield's of fragrance. Black Suede has been gracing medicine cabinets, for better or worse, since 1980 my friends. If you're expecting me to inform you ( like others may have already ) that Black Suede is a nasty scrubber, you will be disappointed. On the other hand, if you're expecting a glowing review claiming it's a diamond in the rough, you won't hear that from me either. I will say though that Black Suede doesn't deserve the hate it's received and most of that is due to snobbery aimed at Avon products in general. I kid you not when I state that a close relative to this fragrance is Cacharel Pour L'Homme. The array of spice in both ensure comparison, but the "smoother" of the two is Black Suede due to its implementation of Amber. While wearing Black Suede, one can detect a hint of "drugstore". That quality doesn't manife...
1 comment
Read more

Chanel copying Guerlain. Why?

By
                      Last month, I had the pleasure of trying Comète by Chanel, the latest addition to their prestigious Les Exclusifs line. This fragrance follows the release of Le Lion in 2020, another standout in the same collection. Like Le Lion , Comète is a beautiful perfume that captures the essence of Chanel’s refined elegance. However, both fragrances bear a striking resemblance to classic creations by Guerlain, leading me to ponder the direction Chanel is taking. Chanel has a great fragrance history. Not as hallowed and old as Guerlain but for past three decades it has far outshone Guerlain. In my view, no other perfume house has come close to Chanel’s excellence in this century. This makes their recent approach of echoing Guerlain classics somewhat perplexing. Have they run out of fresh ideas? Is Roger Dove at the helm of their fragrance division, or have they perhaps...
Post a Comment
Read more

La Chasse Aux Papillons Extreme by L'Artisan Parfumeur

By
I read many reviews before or after I do my own and I seem to be at complete odds with the house of L'Artisan. I have previously said on basenotes that for me, L'Artisan Parfumeur is the most over-rated house I have come across. La Chasse Aux Papillons Extreme does nothing to sway that opinion. Yet another linear, floral dominant scent that does nothing to stir me up or inspire me in any way. This house has "pleasant" nailed down to an art form......but damn...can't we go beyond that? The only attempt at polarization so far has been Dzongkha ....and I found it a jumbled mess. At these prices, move me, anger me, hate me.......but please don't bore me. Extreme in a nutshell is a toned down tuberose with assorted "blossom" thrown in the mix. Is it bad? No, it's an acceptable floral scent that's very timid and just lays on my skin smelling like....well....a toned down version of tuberose with blossom this or that added to it. I'm almost a...
6 comments
Read more