Skip to main content

Paco Rabanne Pour Homme

Image
By
I am reviewing the original Paco Rabanne Pour Homme ( circa 1973 ) thanks to a generous basenoter who sent it to me recently in a swap. He also sent me the current formulation in order for me to do a side by side comparison.

The side by side resulted in what I had already imagined would be the case. Not that the newer formula is terrible by any means. The original version simply is better by being deeper and a bit more masculine. No......you shouldn't go to ebay searching for the vintage formula and paying stupid prices. It's simply a notch or two better than the current and noticeable by comparing the two in real time.

Rabanne Pour Homme opens with a slight shimmer in conjunction with lavender, spices and a subtle woodiness. It's an old school introduction, however a good one. The lavender takes about 5 minutes to raise its volume and evolve into a soapy rendition. I dislike when a boatload of soapy lavender takes over a composition, but here it doesn't go over the top. It's surely noticeable, but never becomes caustic.

Geranium is the leading the floral component in the heart accord. It is a well played card while the lavender interplays with the spicy, green accord that's still unfolding. These two notes ( to me) are the fingerprint of Pour Homme.  Rosewood is listed, but ( for me) is M.I.A.........and that's a shame since I love that note. There is a woody undercurrent, but it's very low key and doesn't introduce itself as a conventional rosewood.

As the drydown arrives, it isn't a dominating accord by any means. The notes used have a tendency to be loud, but not here. The tonka adds a very slight powder effect to an oncoming mossy amber duo. Honey is listed and I can't say I detect it as such. There's also a low volume musk that inserts itself well into the life of the scent. Everything about Paco Rabanne Pour Homme is classic in structure and aroma. Its smell reminds me of the 1970's and that could be good or bad, depending upon how you look at it.

The bottom line however is that Pour Homme is well done for its genre and one of the best in its class. Its success is contingent on the wearer liking classic fougere's. I like this original rendition, but I also have to be in the mood to smell retro. Any collector of classic masculines really should have the vintage formula of Pour Homme in their stockpile. Thumbs up from Aromi for Original Pour Homme.
Labels:

Comments

  1. AnonymousAugust 15, 2011 at 5:28 PM

    Is it easy to tell which bottle is which?
    Thanks.

    ReplyDelete
  2. shamu1August 21, 2011 at 9:09 PM

    This is so underrated, with so many people saying it smells dated. I love the vintage and the current versions equally. It's my favorite fragrance.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Newport by Caswell Massey

By
Bergamot, Mandarin, Lemon, Lavender, Geranium, Muguet, Rose, Ambergris, Cedar, Sandalwood, Vanilla, Musk. After wearing Newport by Caswell Massey a few times and then reading what others had to say about this recent formulation, I found some of the opinions harsh. I have no way to compare it to the heralded vintage formula, nor can I use memory as I've never tried the original. Enter the current version. I do agree with some reviews that this rendition does not bring about the sense of beach and salt, but there's a long line of fragrances that fail to represent their depictions. However, Newport isn't so far off the mark that it's a complete misrepresentation. I can imagine wearing Newport ( or something similar ) in a beach setting. It smells classic due to the way Citrus, Lavender and Geranium are implemented. It's assuredly retro, but it seems to have that intangible I like that keeps me sniffing. Newport, at least on my skin, is top heavy in the sens...
3 comments
Read more

Black Suede by Avon

By
Nutmeg, Clove, Amber, Musk, Moss, Wood Notes. Yes.........I am reviewing one of the Rodney Dangerfield's of fragrance. Black Suede has been gracing medicine cabinets, for better or worse, since 1980 my friends. If you're expecting me to inform you ( like others may have already ) that Black Suede is a nasty scrubber, you will be disappointed. On the other hand, if you're expecting a glowing review claiming it's a diamond in the rough, you won't hear that from me either. I will say though that Black Suede doesn't deserve the hate it's received and most of that is due to snobbery aimed at Avon products in general. I kid you not when I state that a close relative to this fragrance is Cacharel Pour L'Homme. The array of spice in both ensure comparison, but the "smoother" of the two is Black Suede due to its implementation of Amber. While wearing Black Suede, one can detect a hint of "drugstore". That quality doesn't manife...
1 comment
Read more

Lanvin L'Homme

By shamu1
Lord knows the world has enough fresh woody citrus fragrances.  It's a hackneyed genre of masculine perfume, having been done to death by countless designer firms cranking these things out since the 1990s, and there doesn't seem to be an end in sight.  Lanvin L'Homme, released in 1997, is one of the early woody citrus releases, but it (along with Essenza di Zegna) stands out because it's one of the best.  That may sound like it's not saying much, but Lanvin L'Homme really is excellent. I won't get into a long treatise about all of the notes contained in this and how they evolve.  Lanvin L'Homme is sparkling, spicy, woody, transparent and dry.  What I love about this scent is how brilliantly it uses vetiver - the vetiver gives Lanvin L'Homme a woody, dry and somewhat bitter smell, but it also manages to create an effect of sustaining the citrus top notes for several hours.  This results in a fragrance that smells fresh and cheerful from beginning ...
Post a Comment
Read more