Skip to main content

Boss Number One

Image
By shamu1

Most fragrances released during the Eighties were heavy and strong, and I think this explains why so many of them fall into the "love it or hate it" category.  Boss Number One (originally simply called "Boss") is no exception.  It's not only a dense, rich fragrance, but it also has a sort of underlying dirty smell, a quality that will automatically polarize opinions about this scent.

This was the first Hugo Boss fragrance, and it's so different from the rest of their fragrance line.  Whereas almost all of the Boss scents smell cheap, synthetic and devoid of character, Number One is rich, heavy, elegant and smells like it's made of quality materials.

If I were to categorize this scent, I'd call it a tobacco chypre, because tobacco and oakmoss are the two most prominent smells in Number One.  From start to finish, Number One is warm and super smooth, with an overall brownish hue to its scent.  Honey and patchouli are also prominent in this scent, and together they add a sweaty, animalic smell that raises the testosterone level through the roof.  It's also got a kind of subdued, dark and brooding feel to it, making this a perfect scent for nighttime.

Boss Number One has been apparently reformulated many times in its long career, and I do remember earlier versions of this being stronger.  However, the smell itself remains intact for the most part, so this is still some uber-masculine juice.  In terms of sheer power, Number One falls into the same league as powerhouse fragrances like Moods Uomo and Halston Z-14: smooth and strong, but not overpowering; this is not a brutal scent like Lapidus Pour Homme or Davidoff, but rather more of a borderline powerhouse.  It may not have pounding sillage, but it's full of 80s powerhouse swagger.

I love this juice, and it's one of my favorite fragrances from the Eighties.  I hope Hugo Boss never discontinues this.

MY RATING:  9/10
Labels:

Comments

  1. AromiEroticiSeptember 19, 2011 at 9:52 PM

    Good review. I almost bought this at the duty free this summer. I ended up buying CK One instead ( and I'm happy with it), but I need to get a partial of this in the future.

    ReplyDelete
  2. AnonymousSeptember 20, 2011 at 9:40 PM

    I've got the new formulation and two of the originals, which seem to be a little different (they are Boss Cologne). I like them all, but what's weird is that when I take the cap off and smell it, I don't think it smells great. Upon spraying, after perhaps 20 minutes, I find myself really enjoying it, and it just gets better over time. I wonder if it's because it's the kind of fragrance that take time for my mind to fully comprehend and appreciate. I think the thing is that I don't like some of the notes, but over time the great note contrast, dynamism, balance, and complexity are irresistible. Another great thing about it is that used bottles can often be had really cheap on ebay.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

La Chasse Aux Papillons Extreme by L'Artisan Parfumeur

By
I read many reviews before or after I do my own and I seem to be at complete odds with the house of L'Artisan. I have previously said on basenotes that for me, L'Artisan Parfumeur is the most over-rated house I have come across. La Chasse Aux Papillons Extreme does nothing to sway that opinion. Yet another linear, floral dominant scent that does nothing to stir me up or inspire me in any way. This house has "pleasant" nailed down to an art form......but damn...can't we go beyond that? The only attempt at polarization so far has been Dzongkha ....and I found it a jumbled mess. At these prices, move me, anger me, hate me.......but please don't bore me. Extreme in a nutshell is a toned down tuberose with assorted "blossom" thrown in the mix. Is it bad? No, it's an acceptable floral scent that's very timid and just lays on my skin smelling like....well....a toned down version of tuberose with blossom this or that added to it. I'm almost a...
6 comments
Read more

Black Suede by Avon

By
Nutmeg, Clove, Amber, Musk, Moss, Wood Notes. Yes.........I am reviewing one of the Rodney Dangerfield's of fragrance. Black Suede has been gracing medicine cabinets, for better or worse, since 1980 my friends. If you're expecting me to inform you ( like others may have already ) that Black Suede is a nasty scrubber, you will be disappointed. On the other hand, if you're expecting a glowing review claiming it's a diamond in the rough, you won't hear that from me either. I will say though that Black Suede doesn't deserve the hate it's received and most of that is due to snobbery aimed at Avon products in general. I kid you not when I state that a close relative to this fragrance is Cacharel Pour L'Homme. The array of spice in both ensure comparison, but the "smoother" of the two is Black Suede due to its implementation of Amber. While wearing Black Suede, one can detect a hint of "drugstore". That quality doesn't manife...
1 comment
Read more

Chanel copying Guerlain. Why?

By
Last month, I had the pleasure of trying Comète by Chanel, the latest addition to their prestigious Les Exclusifs line. This fragrance follows the release of Le Lion in 2020, another standout in the same collection. Like Le Lion , Comète is a beautiful perfume that captures the essence of Chanel’s refined elegance. However, both fragrances bear a striking resemblance to classic creations by Guerlain, leading me to ponder the direction Chanel is taking. Chanel has a great fragrance history. Not as hallowed and old as Guerlain but for past three decades it has far outshone Guerlain. In my view, no other perfume house has come close to Chanel’s excellence in this century. This makes their recent approach of echoing Guerlain classics somewhat perplexing. Have they run out of fresh ideas? Is Roger Dove at the helm of their fragrance division, or have they perhaps shifted towards AI-driven creation ? For those unfamiliar with these recent Chanel releases, Comète is a modern interpretati...
Post a Comment
Read more