Skip to main content

Xerjoff: Richwood


Ah, Xerjoff. I knew we'd cross paths someday. While there seem to be dozens of overpriced niche releases, the last four-odd years have seen an explosion in scents that set one back more than two-hundred dollars. When the prices get this high, the perfumes have to be that much better to make them worth my while. Give me a great fragrance and I'll shell over a hundred dollars. Give me a holy grail in a much-loved category ( e.g. gardenias, leather frags ) and I might shell out over two-hundred dollars. Ask me for four-hundred dollars and smelling your fragrance has to be the equivalent of Apollo sticking his fingers up my nose and zapping my brain full of everlasting ecstasy.

Rolling in at 635$, Richwood is begging a lot from me before I even open the tester vial, and not selling to me with its name. I know it's trying to appeal to the simpler sorts among the nouveau riche, instinctively drawn to Prosperityphallus in a bottle, but to me it's the kind of thing designed to send a cheap gold digger into estrus:

''It's Richwood, babe. You know, it's over si-ix, hun-dred, doll-ars!''

All this aside, Richwood is a really nice fragrance. The top notes roll in taking their cue from two different fragrances, both Tom Fords: Noir de Noir, and Black Orchid. Richwood at this point is about 70% Noir de Noir, 25% Black Orchid, and 5% Angel ( or something from amid the teeming Angel-flanker clan ). Think a smooth, soft, edgeless oud note, patchouli, rose, chocolate, and coconut, with a pleasing earthy quality that contrasts the sweetness. If the fragrance stayed this delightful, it might have a hope of impoverishing me, but the drydown is somewhat different; much smoother, rather blander, all the notes going on mute and descending into a plush balsamic-patchouli sheen. Imagine the drydown of the women's Dune minus the spice and with patchouli, and you'll have it. If you like smooth, smooth, smooth fragrances with out a single note contrasting or standing out, then there's large chance you're in heaven here, as it is very well blended. It just leaves me a little bored after the first half hour. To be fair, though, it lasts much longer than Noir de Noir, which gives up the ghost rapidly. Richwood lasts a good ten hours on my skin.

With patchouli, rose, and sweet, balsamic drydowns being the in-thing just now, this one has a lot of competition. Probably my favorite from the niche set for gourmand patchouli would be Lutens' Borneo, but really, Richwood has some shockingly close cousins downmarket. Marry one of the ever-present A*men flankers ( Pure Malt, Pure Coffee, Pure Crack, ad nauseum ) to Dior's rose-patch fest Midnight Poison and you'll probably see the family resemblance. Which is my suspicion about many of the status seeking niches, like Bond, or recent Creeds: give the public what they already know and like in pricier bottles.

It seems to work.

Comments

  1. Good review Sug. Too bad numerous high end niche is smoke and mirrors.

    This one sounds good if it were reasonably priced, but alas.......it is not.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Black Suede by Avon

Nutmeg, Clove, Amber, Musk, Moss, Wood Notes. Yes.........I am reviewing one of the Rodney Dangerfield's of fragrance. Black Suede has been gracing medicine cabinets, for better or worse, since 1980 my friends. If you're expecting me to inform you ( like others may have already ) that Black Suede is a nasty scrubber, you will be disappointed. On the other hand, if you're expecting a glowing review claiming it's a diamond in the rough, you won't hear that from me either. I will say though that Black Suede doesn't deserve the hate it's received and most of that is due to snobbery aimed at Avon products in general. I kid you not when I state that a close relative to this fragrance is Cacharel Pour L'Homme. The array of spice in both ensure comparison, but the "smoother" of the two is Black Suede due to its implementation of Amber. While wearing Black Suede, one can detect a hint of "drugstore". That quality doesn't manife...

Chanel copying Guerlain. Why?

                      Last month, I had the pleasure of trying Comète by Chanel, the latest addition to their prestigious Les Exclusifs line. This fragrance follows the release of Le Lion in 2020, another standout in the same collection. Like Le Lion , Comète is a beautiful perfume that captures the essence of Chanel’s refined elegance. However, both fragrances bear a striking resemblance to classic creations by Guerlain, leading me to ponder the direction Chanel is taking. Chanel has a great fragrance history. Not as hallowed and old as Guerlain but for past three decades it has far outshone Guerlain. In my view, no other perfume house has come close to Chanel’s excellence in this century. This makes their recent approach of echoing Guerlain classics somewhat perplexing. Have they run out of fresh ideas? Is Roger Dove at the helm of their fragrance division, or have they perhaps...

Teatro Alla Scala - Krizia

I tried Comete by Chanel today and wanted to write about how Chanel is going by the way of Roger Dove - copying old masterpieces. I did not know where to post that and then I realized I have been neglecting this blog. When I logged in I saw an unfinished post I wrote a year ago about Teatro Alla Scala by Krizia. Teatro is the best full bodied floral - better than any Chanel or Patou. Even better than Gucci L'Arte.  A brief background: Teatro Alla Scala is an Opera theatre in Milan. The bottle's design is an homage to the theatre and the perfume an homage to its sophisticated patrons. I wanted to write a symphony for it. Maybe some day. For now here are few notes I wrote comparing EDT vs EDP.  And if you don't have Teatro, your wardrobe is incomplete Rose, Jasmine, Tuberose. Jammy berries (more in EDP) . Honey note listed is probably the jammy part Vetiver & moss - more in EDT Rose and carnation is more than jasmine and that is what separates it from other florals like J...