Skip to main content

Burberrys for Men

Artemesia, Bergamot, Tarragon, Mint, Juniper, Juniper.
Carnation, Jasmine, Marjoram, Patchouli, Pepper, Rose.
Amber, Leather, Musk, Sandalwood, Oakmoss, Cedar, Vetiver, Myrrh, Civet.

The first thing I noticed while wearing this version of Burberrys is its kinship to the original Gucci pour Homme from 1976. I won't drone on about it, but it's there and if you have both, please compare. What is truly confusing about "Burberrys" is that there is one that preceded the 1981 release, has the same name but resides in a different shaped bottle. The ones that came after 1981 (to me ) are just as confusing, but I'm getting off track here.

This "type" of classically constructed masculine gives me the feeling that I should be wearing it on a cool, crisp night. It's formal if anything and doesn't posses a frivolous bone in its substantially limpid body. It leans mature for sure, but dated it is not. This is like other "classics" that defy time and space. It will smell authoritative and well done 20 years from now.

All the notes implemented in Burberrys for Men lend gravitas, depth and a full bodied aroma indicative of creations over 30 years ago. They perform as intended with rather masterful blending. You can smell basically all the players and yet you can't smell any of "them". Confused? Don't be. This is tuned to the perfection of its time and is symphonic as it unravels. The bottom line ( on my skin ) is a quality woody leather accented by assorted spice, earth tones and an intermittent floral punctuation.  As Burberrys for Men transitions to the base and drydown stage, it's augmented once more with a sensual character.

This fragrance, like others of its genre and time, don't "wear" like the contemporary releases marketed to men. There's the inherent denseness and sobriety that make it more of a dedicated scent than a versatile one. This scent is right in my wheelhouse due to my age and predilections. Could I wear it all season and regardless of situation? Of course I could, but I would choose to don it in regards to climate and function. This is the very reason I have so many fragrances to begin with.

For those who like masculines such as the aforementioned Gucci pour Homme from 1976 or Guerlain's Derby, Burberrys for Men would probably offer you a pleasant surprise. I'm persuaded to believe the perfumer looked to these blueprints and then put a slightly different twist in the composition. Sillage is perfect with longevity approximately 6 hours. The skin scent stage easily rolls into the next day. Thumbs up from Aromi for Burberrys for Men with the usual recommendation to sample before purchase.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Black Suede by Avon

Nutmeg, Clove, Amber, Musk, Moss, Wood Notes. Yes.........I am reviewing one of the Rodney Dangerfield's of fragrance. Black Suede has been gracing medicine cabinets, for better or worse, since 1980 my friends. If you're expecting me to inform you ( like others may have already ) that Black Suede is a nasty scrubber, you will be disappointed. On the other hand, if you're expecting a glowing review claiming it's a diamond in the rough, you won't hear that from me either. I will say though that Black Suede doesn't deserve the hate it's received and most of that is due to snobbery aimed at Avon products in general. I kid you not when I state that a close relative to this fragrance is Cacharel Pour L'Homme. The array of spice in both ensure comparison, but the "smoother" of the two is Black Suede due to its implementation of Amber. While wearing Black Suede, one can detect a hint of "drugstore". That quality doesn't manife...

Chanel copying Guerlain. Why?

                      Last month, I had the pleasure of trying Comète by Chanel, the latest addition to their prestigious Les Exclusifs line. This fragrance follows the release of Le Lion in 2020, another standout in the same collection. Like Le Lion , Comète is a beautiful perfume that captures the essence of Chanel’s refined elegance. However, both fragrances bear a striking resemblance to classic creations by Guerlain, leading me to ponder the direction Chanel is taking. Chanel has a great fragrance history. Not as hallowed and old as Guerlain but for past three decades it has far outshone Guerlain. In my view, no other perfume house has come close to Chanel’s excellence in this century. This makes their recent approach of echoing Guerlain classics somewhat perplexing. Have they run out of fresh ideas? Is Roger Dove at the helm of their fragrance division, or have they perhaps...

La Chasse Aux Papillons Extreme by L'Artisan Parfumeur

I read many reviews before or after I do my own and I seem to be at complete odds with the house of L'Artisan. I have previously said on basenotes that for me, L'Artisan Parfumeur is the most over-rated house I have come across. La Chasse Aux Papillons Extreme does nothing to sway that opinion. Yet another linear, floral dominant scent that does nothing to stir me up or inspire me in any way. This house has "pleasant" nailed down to an art form......but damn...can't we go beyond that? The only attempt at polarization so far has been Dzongkha ....and I found it a jumbled mess. At these prices, move me, anger me, hate me.......but please don't bore me. Extreme in a nutshell is a toned down tuberose with assorted "blossom" thrown in the mix. Is it bad? No, it's an acceptable floral scent that's very timid and just lays on my skin smelling like....well....a toned down version of tuberose with blossom this or that added to it. I'm almost a...