Skip to main content

Burberrys for Men Original ( Flask Bottle )

Normally, I'll write out the listed notes at the top of the review because one should do that if at all possible. In the case of the Original Burberrys for Men, I cannot because the information is too sketchy and seemingly intertwined with the "other" Burberrys for Men. They aren't the same fragrance inside different bottles, hence my leaving it all to educated guessing and a dash of experience.

This image is one I copied from an ebay seller's listing. The seller's name is superalx. I've used it because it's the best picture I have come across displaying the flask-type bottle and the best thing is, it's immediately behind the Burberrys for Men I've already reviewed. It's these 2 releases that cause the confusion. I own a 30ml. flask splash bottle ( background ) and a 50ml. ribbed bottle as shown in front. They are different fragrances, but both classically constructed and masculine.

The flask bottle in the background is what I want to evaluate and describe. I have had a difficult time attempting to review this fragrance for a few reasons. Already having reviewed its counterpart, I find it a less appealing and not as interesting a wear.
There's also an aspect I can only describe as subtle mustard that is inherent. I experience it each time I apply this scent and it usually rears its head during the heart and base stage. I find it distracting, but not necessarily annoying.

The gist of this Burberrys for Men is a mild and fleeting Citrus, Carnation, Leather, Cedar, Sandal, Patchouli and Vetiver. To be fair, my splash bottle may be a little "off" due to age and it being a splash to begin with. However, its outward condition and color is outstanding as is its box and the information/envelope contents inside. The previous owner kept this aesthetically pristine, so its doubtful they would have left it in light and heat. Then again, who the hell knows for sure........

All that aside, the Carnation in this Burberrys is front and center.
This is reminiscent of many masculines circa mid to late 70's. The feel of it is dark and a bit serious, but not somber. I cannot help but think this was the most overused note in masculine perfumery back then. It's immediately identifiable and has a propensity for coming to the fore and staying there.

I suppose it is sounding like I have no love for this release. Well, part of me likes it because I grew up in that era, but I guess a bigger part of me is enjoying different aromas, styles and approaches to creating than is evident here. Had this release revealed a transitional nature and a few exciting facets, my opinion would be swayed to tell you "Yes !!!! This is worth adding to your collection". Unfortunately, I'm unmoved and wearing Burberrys for Men Cologne has built no rapport. Sillage is moderate with longevity approximately 4 hours before morphing into a close scent. Neutral rating from Aromi and a sample wear is highly recommended in lieu of purchase.









Comments

  1. I have worn these two versions only once each. The first reminded me of Vetiver de Puig, while the second reminded me of Mesmerize for Men by Avon (which is a really good Avon scent). I prefer something like Fendi Uomo (more complex and smoother) to the first but the second is certainly a top shelf scent of its kind, though if you are on a budget I'd say try Mesmerize and you might save quite a bit of money.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I have what may seem like an uneducated (fairly ignorant) question: is Burberrys a fashion brand, like Burberry? The "plural" aspect here of Burberry - just add "s" - makes me wonder if the company is related to Burberry, or a separate entity altogether. I suspect they're totally different companies, but I'm not sure. Any clues?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Bryan, I wish I knew bro. It seems the earlier releases were a result of the right hand not aware of what the left hand was doing. They are Bethco products if that helps at all.

    Bigsly, I'll have to get around to comparing the ribbed bottle of Burberrys to Mesmerize.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Fair enough, I'll have to check older Burberry fragrances if I come across them and see if any Bethco labels are on them.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Black Suede by Avon

Nutmeg, Clove, Amber, Musk, Moss, Wood Notes. Yes.........I am reviewing one of the Rodney Dangerfield's of fragrance. Black Suede has been gracing medicine cabinets, for better or worse, since 1980 my friends. If you're expecting me to inform you ( like others may have already ) that Black Suede is a nasty scrubber, you will be disappointed. On the other hand, if you're expecting a glowing review claiming it's a diamond in the rough, you won't hear that from me either. I will say though that Black Suede doesn't deserve the hate it's received and most of that is due to snobbery aimed at Avon products in general. I kid you not when I state that a close relative to this fragrance is Cacharel Pour L'Homme. The array of spice in both ensure comparison, but the "smoother" of the two is Black Suede due to its implementation of Amber. While wearing Black Suede, one can detect a hint of "drugstore". That quality doesn't manife...

Chanel copying Guerlain. Why?

                      Last month, I had the pleasure of trying Comète by Chanel, the latest addition to their prestigious Les Exclusifs line. This fragrance follows the release of Le Lion in 2020, another standout in the same collection. Like Le Lion , Comète is a beautiful perfume that captures the essence of Chanel’s refined elegance. However, both fragrances bear a striking resemblance to classic creations by Guerlain, leading me to ponder the direction Chanel is taking. Chanel has a great fragrance history. Not as hallowed and old as Guerlain but for past three decades it has far outshone Guerlain. In my view, no other perfume house has come close to Chanel’s excellence in this century. This makes their recent approach of echoing Guerlain classics somewhat perplexing. Have they run out of fresh ideas? Is Roger Dove at the helm of their fragrance division, or have they perhaps...

Teatro Alla Scala - Krizia

I tried Comete by Chanel today and wanted to write about how Chanel is going by the way of Roger Dove - copying old masterpieces. I did not know where to post that and then I realized I have been neglecting this blog. When I logged in I saw an unfinished post I wrote a year ago about Teatro Alla Scala by Krizia. Teatro is the best full bodied floral - better than any Chanel or Patou. Even better than Gucci L'Arte.  A brief background: Teatro Alla Scala is an Opera theatre in Milan. The bottle's design is an homage to the theatre and the perfume an homage to its sophisticated patrons. I wanted to write a symphony for it. Maybe some day. For now here are few notes I wrote comparing EDT vs EDP.  And if you don't have Teatro, your wardrobe is incomplete Rose, Jasmine, Tuberose. Jammy berries (more in EDP) . Honey note listed is probably the jammy part Vetiver & moss - more in EDT Rose and carnation is more than jasmine and that is what separates it from other florals like J...