Skip to main content

Red For Men


I have read over twenty reviews of Red For Men, and not one of them is able to adequately describe what it smells like.  That's not a criticism of the reviewers, but rather a commentary on the nature of this scent. When Red For Men was released in 1991, its claim to fame was that it contained over 600 ingredients.  Of course, such a thick stew renders it almost impossible for a person to identify its individual notes.  To further complicate things, I don't find that any of the traditional fragrance categories - fougere, oriental, chypre, leather, floral, etc. - apply to Red For Men. 

The two most prominent notes I smell in Red are leather and moss - everything else is a cement-like brew of spices, herbs, ambers, and wood notes, many of which are obviously synthetic. Two fragrances which are very similar to Red are Preferred Stock and Trussardi Uomo, though Red is not a dark scent and is less leathery than those two. It's a powerhouse for sure, in an 80s style, sort of.  It isn't dark like most 80s bombs, and it's also sweet and very spicy, which is also not typical of 80s fragrances.  What it does have is massive weight, with the transparency of a brick shithouse.

I like Red For Men, but it lacks something, and that's charisma. It doesn't have the brash swagger of a powerhouse like Quorum or Lapidus Pour Homme - sure it's loud, unrefined and crude, but it feels like it's a strong scent merely for the sake of being a strong scent. I think it's the heavily synthetic smell and the sheer volume of notes that blur Red's identity, thereby rendering it a somewhat confused scent.  Plus, it was released at a time - the early 90s - when powerscents were no longer in style.  Red For Men smells like it's trying to be part of the Fendi Uomo and Kouros crew, and it shares a lot in common with those guys, but it came too late to the party.  It's a powerscent that lacks a real identity, and comes off as somewhat characterless.

All in all, however, Red For Men is still a very good fragrance, and I like it.  It's strong, very masculine, has a lot of presence, and smells good, even if it does lack some character.  It has many diehard fans, so there are a lot of people who will strongly disagree with my criticisms.  It's a good fragrance that every power fan should check out.

MY RATING: 7.5/10

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

La Chasse Aux Papillons Extreme by L'Artisan Parfumeur

I read many reviews before or after I do my own and I seem to be at complete odds with the house of L'Artisan. I have previously said on basenotes that for me, L'Artisan Parfumeur is the most over-rated house I have come across. La Chasse Aux Papillons Extreme does nothing to sway that opinion. Yet another linear, floral dominant scent that does nothing to stir me up or inspire me in any way. This house has "pleasant" nailed down to an art form......but damn...can't we go beyond that? The only attempt at polarization so far has been Dzongkha ....and I found it a jumbled mess. At these prices, move me, anger me, hate me.......but please don't bore me. Extreme in a nutshell is a toned down tuberose with assorted "blossom" thrown in the mix. Is it bad? No, it's an acceptable floral scent that's very timid and just lays on my skin smelling like....well....a toned down version of tuberose with blossom this or that added to it. I'm almost a...

Black Suede by Avon

Nutmeg, Clove, Amber, Musk, Moss, Wood Notes. Yes.........I am reviewing one of the Rodney Dangerfield's of fragrance. Black Suede has been gracing medicine cabinets, for better or worse, since 1980 my friends. If you're expecting me to inform you ( like others may have already ) that Black Suede is a nasty scrubber, you will be disappointed. On the other hand, if you're expecting a glowing review claiming it's a diamond in the rough, you won't hear that from me either. I will say though that Black Suede doesn't deserve the hate it's received and most of that is due to snobbery aimed at Avon products in general. I kid you not when I state that a close relative to this fragrance is Cacharel Pour L'Homme. The array of spice in both ensure comparison, but the "smoother" of the two is Black Suede due to its implementation of Amber. While wearing Black Suede, one can detect a hint of "drugstore". That quality doesn't manife...

Chanel copying Guerlain. Why?

Last month, I had the pleasure of trying Comète by Chanel, the latest addition to their prestigious Les Exclusifs line. This fragrance follows the release of Le Lion in 2020, another standout in the same collection. Like Le Lion , Comète is a beautiful perfume that captures the essence of Chanel’s refined elegance. However, both fragrances bear a striking resemblance to classic creations by Guerlain, leading me to ponder the direction Chanel is taking. Chanel has a great fragrance history. Not as hallowed and old as Guerlain but for past three decades it has far outshone Guerlain. In my view, no other perfume house has come close to Chanel’s excellence in this century. This makes their recent approach of echoing Guerlain classics somewhat perplexing. Have they run out of fresh ideas? Is Roger Dove at the helm of their fragrance division, or have they perhaps shifted towards AI-driven creation ? For those unfamiliar with these recent Chanel releases, Comète is a modern interpretati...