Skip to main content

Red For Men


I have read over twenty reviews of Red For Men, and not one of them is able to adequately describe what it smells like.  That's not a criticism of the reviewers, but rather a commentary on the nature of this scent. When Red For Men was released in 1991, its claim to fame was that it contained over 600 ingredients.  Of course, such a thick stew renders it almost impossible for a person to identify its individual notes.  To further complicate things, I don't find that any of the traditional fragrance categories - fougere, oriental, chypre, leather, floral, etc. - apply to Red For Men. 

The two most prominent notes I smell in Red are leather and moss - everything else is a cement-like brew of spices, herbs, ambers, and wood notes, many of which are obviously synthetic. Two fragrances which are very similar to Red are Preferred Stock and Trussardi Uomo, though Red is not a dark scent and is less leathery than those two. It's a powerhouse for sure, in an 80s style, sort of.  It isn't dark like most 80s bombs, and it's also sweet and very spicy, which is also not typical of 80s fragrances.  What it does have is massive weight, with the transparency of a brick shithouse.

I like Red For Men, but it lacks something, and that's charisma. It doesn't have the brash swagger of a powerhouse like Quorum or Lapidus Pour Homme - sure it's loud, unrefined and crude, but it feels like it's a strong scent merely for the sake of being a strong scent. I think it's the heavily synthetic smell and the sheer volume of notes that blur Red's identity, thereby rendering it a somewhat confused scent.  Plus, it was released at a time - the early 90s - when powerscents were no longer in style.  Red For Men smells like it's trying to be part of the Fendi Uomo and Kouros crew, and it shares a lot in common with those guys, but it came too late to the party.  It's a powerscent that lacks a real identity, and comes off as somewhat characterless.

All in all, however, Red For Men is still a very good fragrance, and I like it.  It's strong, very masculine, has a lot of presence, and smells good, even if it does lack some character.  It has many diehard fans, so there are a lot of people who will strongly disagree with my criticisms.  It's a good fragrance that every power fan should check out.

MY RATING: 7.5/10

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Newport by Caswell Massey

Bergamot, Mandarin, Lemon, Lavender, Geranium, Muguet, Rose, Ambergris, Cedar, Sandalwood, Vanilla, Musk. After wearing Newport by Caswell Massey a few times and then reading what others had to say about this recent formulation, I found some of the opinions harsh. I have no way to compare it to the heralded vintage formula, nor can I use memory as I've never tried the original. Enter the current version. I do agree with some reviews that this rendition does not bring about the sense of beach and salt, but there's a long line of fragrances that fail to represent their depictions. However, Newport isn't so far off the mark that it's a complete misrepresentation. I can imagine wearing Newport ( or something similar ) in a beach setting. It smells classic due to the way Citrus, Lavender and Geranium are implemented. It's assuredly retro, but it seems to have that intangible I like that keeps me sniffing. Newport, at least on my skin, is top heavy in the sens...

Black Suede by Avon

Nutmeg, Clove, Amber, Musk, Moss, Wood Notes. Yes.........I am reviewing one of the Rodney Dangerfield's of fragrance. Black Suede has been gracing medicine cabinets, for better or worse, since 1980 my friends. If you're expecting me to inform you ( like others may have already ) that Black Suede is a nasty scrubber, you will be disappointed. On the other hand, if you're expecting a glowing review claiming it's a diamond in the rough, you won't hear that from me either. I will say though that Black Suede doesn't deserve the hate it's received and most of that is due to snobbery aimed at Avon products in general. I kid you not when I state that a close relative to this fragrance is Cacharel Pour L'Homme. The array of spice in both ensure comparison, but the "smoother" of the two is Black Suede due to its implementation of Amber. While wearing Black Suede, one can detect a hint of "drugstore". That quality doesn't manife...

Lanvin L'Homme

Lord knows the world has enough fresh woody citrus fragrances.  It's a hackneyed genre of masculine perfume, having been done to death by countless designer firms cranking these things out since the 1990s, and there doesn't seem to be an end in sight.  Lanvin L'Homme, released in 1997, is one of the early woody citrus releases, but it (along with Essenza di Zegna) stands out because it's one of the best.  That may sound like it's not saying much, but Lanvin L'Homme really is excellent. I won't get into a long treatise about all of the notes contained in this and how they evolve.  Lanvin L'Homme is sparkling, spicy, woody, transparent and dry.  What I love about this scent is how brilliantly it uses vetiver - the vetiver gives Lanvin L'Homme a woody, dry and somewhat bitter smell, but it also manages to create an effect of sustaining the citrus top notes for several hours.  This results in a fragrance that smells fresh and cheerful from beginning ...